Featured
Loading...

[DOWNLOAD]VIDEO::HAWA NDIO WANAUME WANAOWEZA KUENDESHA GARI KARIKA BARABARA HATARI.

MAAJABU YA MTANDAONI,BOFYA HAPO CHINI HUTAAMINI MACHO YAKO




Disadvantages of Deep Litter System
 Incidences of pecking, egg eating, cannibalism, feather plucking are high;
 There is an accumulation of pests and pathogens in the litter. Dry litter causes respiratory problems;
 It is difficult to know a poor layer as birds lay eggs in common nests;
 Eggs may become dirty especially if laid on the floor;
 Litter may be difficult to find in some areas.
B. Battery Cage System
In this system, birds are confined entirely in cages throughout their laying period, see figure 2.5.The cages are made of wire mesh. In each cage 1-3 birds are kept. The cages are arranged in rows which are then arranged in tiers, that is, a row is built over another. Cages have tiers varying from 3-6 in numbers with slanting floors to allow the eggs roll easily into the tray. The lowest tiers are normally 60-90cm above the floor. This height allows easy cleaning of the floor. The water troughs and feeder are fitted above the front side of the cages from one end of the row to the other. Eggs are collected from a tray behind the tiers. The cages are 45cm wide and at the front 45cm high and 57.5cm deep.
Figure 2.5: Battery cage system
We hope that your answer included the following causes of direct contamination:
 touching infected skin, or
 being in close contact with a person who is infected or who is sneezing, and/or coughing.
Advantages of Battery System
 Higher egg production due to less energy wastage by birds;
 Accurate egg records can be kept because it is easy to know which bird has laid;
 Cannibalism and egg eating are minimized;
 Eggs are clean because the hens do not step on them;
 Less labour is needed especially where mechanization is practiced
 It is easy to identify sick birds quickly;
 Birds do not contaminate food and water thus there is no re-infection with worms and coccodiosis;
 Culling or handling is easy as hens are restricted to a small place;
 Broodiness is discouraged as the birds are not able to reach eggs;
 A large number of birds can be kept in a small place;
 There is greater efficiency in the control of diseases and parasites.
Poultry Keeping & Management
Page 21
Disadvantages of Battery System
 A high initial capital is required in addition to the house;
 It requires increased level of management;
 In case of a disease outbreak, it can spread very fast;
 Birds develop bruises on combs, breast and toes.
3. Semi Intensive System
The semi intensive system can be divided into two: the fold system and the house and run method.
A. The Fold system
In this system, birds are confined in small structures called an ark or fold. A fold unit measure 3.5m long by 1.5m wide and 1.5m high. This is enough to hold 10-15 hens.
One third of the fold is roofed to provide shelter. The rest of the fold is left open but it is enclosed with wire mesh. The unroofed part is used for sunning and exercise. The folds should be moved daily to a fresh ground to reduce build up of diseases, provide fresh grass, avoid accumulation of droppings and also to spread the manure. See figure 2.6 for an illustration of the fold system.
Figure 2.6: The fold system with wheels
Advantage of the fold system
 Manure is spread uniformly in the field.
 Less feed is used because the bird eat grass
 This system reduces build-up of parasites and diseases.
Disadvantages of the fold system
 Few birds are kept per fold. Where many birds are kept, many folds will be required and this is very expensive
 It is labour intensive in that folds have to be moved from one place to the other.
 Individual egg production record is difficult to keep.
Poultry Keeping & Management
Page 22
B. House and Run Method
This method is useful for keeping small population of birds, around 20-50 birds. It consists of solid roofed housing which is used for keeping birds at night, laying eggs and roosting. Birds are allowed to run freely around the house during the day within an area enclosed with chicken wire. It is desirable to provide two runs (Run A and B) for alternating use to avoid build up of diseases and parasites. As Run A is being used for poultry, Run B can rest under a vegetable crop. Birds should be rotated between Runs A & B after every 6 months or one year in order to give ample time for the parasites, worms and disease pathogens to die off. See figure 2.7 for an illustration of this system.
Figure 2.7: House and run housing system
Advantages of the house and run method
 It facilitates the rearing of about 20-50 birds as a side (supplementary) business within a large commercial farm.
 Security for the birds especially at night is good since the building is usually a permanent house.
 The run does not need large a area as in the extensive method.
Disadvantages of the house and run method
 Accumulation of parasitic worms and pathogens in the fenced area.
 Cost of fencing and permanent house is high.
 Losses from snakes, wild animals and thieves.
That brings us to the end of this section on poultry housing management systems. We hope you now understand the different systems and are able to pick one for your poultry project.
Before you continue, review what you have just learnt by completing the following activity.
Poultry Keeping & Management
Page 23
You have now come to the end of our second unit on poultry housing. Let us review
what you have learnt.
Unit Summary
In this unit we have discussed described the requirements for a good poultry house.
We noted that these include good ventilation, enough space, and protection from
weather elements and predators. Next we looked at how to design a poultry house.
We hope you still remember that you need to allow 4-5sq feet per bird when
designing the size of your poultry house. Lastly we considered the various poultry
production systems used by farmers. These were broadly divided into three main
categories, namely, the extensive or free range system, the intensive system such as
the deep litter system; and the semi-intensive system such as the fold system. We
hope you are now able to make an informed decision when choosing a housing
system for your poultry project.
In the next unit you will learn about poultry breeds.
Activity 2.3
Poultry Housing Management Systems (Time: 15 minutes)
Draw a line to connect a poultry housing management system with its
unique feature.
Housing management system Features
Extensive or free range
system
Birds confined in arks or folds
which are moved daily to fresh
ground
Battery cage system
House surrounded by a wire mesh
enclosure that allows birds to run
freely during the day.
Fold system
Birds confined in a building and
stay in doors for the whole of
their life
House and run system
Birds are kept inside a cage
throughout their laying period
Deep litter system
Birds roam freely in fenced
ground with a simple house to
provide shelter at night
Poultry Keeping & Management
Page 24
Unit 3
Poultry Breeds and Incubation
Introduction
In the last unit we learnt about the qualities of a good poultry house, how to
estimate the size of a poultry house and the different housing systems used by
farmers. In this unit we shall look at the common chicken breeds found in Kenya. We
shall also discuss both natural and artificial incubation practices. As usual, let us start
with our unit objectives.
Unit Objectives
By the end of this unit you should be able to:
 Identify the common chicken breeds found in Kenya;
 Apply the appropriate incubation practices in the hatching of chicks.
Section 3.1: Common Poultry Breeds
The term poultry refers to domesticated birds kept for meat, eggs and feather
production. There are different species of poultry which are kept by farmers. These
are:
 chicken
 ducks
 geese
 turkey
 quails
 ornamental chicken
Chicken keeping dominates the poultry business as one of the species that is reared
by a majority of farmers. In this section we shall discuss common chicken breeds
found in Kenya.
Chicken Breeds
There are three breeds of chicken found in Kenya. These are:
 Indigenous chicken
 Exotic layer and broiler chicken
Let us examine each breed in further detail starting with indigenous chicken.
Poultry Keeping & Management
Page 25
1. INDIGENOUS CHICKEN (Kienyeji chicken)
Indigenous chicken are mostly kept under the free-range management system in small flocks of less than 30 birds. These are birds on which no selection of breeds or improvement by crossbreeding has been done. Many households in rural areas keep this chicken for domestic consumption. They are more robust and adapt to local conditions than hybrids. Indigenous chicken lay between 8 and 15 eggs per clutch depending on availability of feed. They are broody and hatch about 80% of the eggs they sit on. However only 20-30% attain maturity. This poor survival rate is caused by exposure to risks such as diseases, predators and poor nutrition, which reduce their productivity. If these risks are controlled, their survival rate can increase by 80%. Figure 3.1 shows a picture of indigenous chicken.
Figure 3.1: Indigenous or Kienyeji chicken
Advantages of Indigenous Chicken/Improved Indigenous Chicken (Kuroiler/Kenbro) include:
 They are easy to establish for low income families;
 They are more prolific and unproblematic to rear on small plots of land;
 They are more genetically diverse,
  • TAFADHALI SHARE HABARI HII KWA RAFIKI ZAKO HAPO CHINI ILI IWAFIKIE NA WENGINE PIA
  • Pig industry sustains livelihoods of many families in Kenya. Pig rearing has been one of wellestablishedindustry in Kenya following growing export markets and increasing number of health conscious consumers. Pig production if efficiently managed has great potentials for increasing protein supply in Kenya. Smallholder pig farms in Tharaka-Nithi County have been facing varying and dismal profits. The main objective of this study will be to establish which institutional arrangements and management factors affect the profit efficiency of small-holder pig farmers in Tharaka-Nithi County. A multi-stage purposive sampling technique will be adopted to collect cross sectional data of eighty (80) smallholder pig farmers in Maara Constituency by the use of semi-structured interview schedules. The work will employ Data Envelopment Analysis to come up with profit efficiency rankings among the farmers and stochastic frontier profit function will be used to analyze the factors that affect profit efficiency. The data will be processed using STATA and DEA Frontier packages. The findings could be useful to the stakeholders of the pig industry sub sector to formulate policies pertaining to pig enterprise inputs, marketing issues and financial products and also can establish benchmarks which can be used as a package for enhancing and stabilizing profit efficiencies of smallholder pig farmers which in turn could help improve the Kenya economy. An Overview of Livestock Sub-sector in Kenya Perspectives, Opportunities and Innovations for Market Access for Market Access for Pastoral Producers Recent statistics point that the livestock sub-sector in Kenya accounts for approximately 10% of the National Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This is 30% of the agricultural GDP. It employs about 50% of the national agricultural workforce and about 90% of the ASAL workforce. 95% of ASAL household income comes from this sub-sector. This is despite the fact that the sector receives only 1 % of the total annual budget allocation. The livestock resource base is estimated at 60 million units comprising of 29 million indigenous and exotic chicken, 10 million beef cattle, 3 million dairy and dairy crosses, 9 million goats, 7 million sheep, 0.8 mi camels, 0.52 mi donkeys and 0.3 million pigs. (Strategy for Revitalizing Agriculture (SRA) 2003) Kenya is broadly self-sufficient in most livestock products but is a net importer of red meat mostly inform of on-the-hoof animals trekked across the porous boundaries of neighbouring countries- Somalia, Ethiopia, Sudan, Uganda and Tanzania. Livestock supply in Kenya results from a complex set of interactions between Kenya and its neighbours and the traditional Middle East market and their respective livestock populations, demand and market prices. Kenya is part of a regional market where livestock flow according to markets and price differentials in a liberalized system throughout the region as a whole and where Nairobi represents a focus of demand for the region Supply of red-meat from domestic cattle, shoats and camels falls short of demand, and is almost permanently augmented by a traditional livestock trade drawn in from neighbouring countries, especially Somalia, Tanzania, Sudan and Ethiopia in varying quantities according to demand, which maintains a supply/demand [1.6MB]SIJAAMINI WEMA SEPETU ANACHOKIFAYA HAPO KWENYE HII VIDEO BOFYA UONE
    Newer Posts Older Posts
    © Copyright Mambomseto Blog | Designed By Code Nirvana
    Back To Top